Rubric-based process rewards improve deep research agents’ evidence gathering

Dr.Credit rewards tool calls for adding new rubric-relevant evidence, rather than assigning every research step the final report’s score.

Chinese Tech
Yingjian Zhu · Zhenyi Wang · Jiaxin Guo · Kun Ding · Ying Wang · Shen Huang · +3 more

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences · State Key Laboratory of Multimodal Artificial Intelligence Systems (MAIS) · Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences · Alibaba Token Hub, Alibaba Group · Peking University

Research Digest··2 min read
Zhu et al.

The authors use task rubrics as a common reference for evaluating both completed reports and intermediate tool use.

Why this paper

From University of Chinese Academy of Sciences and 4 others

In one line

Rubric-grounded process credit, which tracks accumulated support per rubric, improves deep research agent performance and enables an 8B model to match proprietary systems.

What we could check

  • ·No code link found
  • ·No weights link found
  • ·No dataset link found
  • ·No compute details found
  • ·No stated limitations found
  • ·No benchmark numbers found

Observed from the paper text and links we have. Absence here means we did not find it, not that it does not exist.

§

Research Digest

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.