Serbian President Vučić resigns after months of anti-corruption protests

Leader steps down, triggering early elections as he plans to run for prime minister

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić has resigned after more than a year of student-led protests and growing public anger over corruption allegations, ending his nine-year tenure and paving the way for early elections.

Addressing supporters outside the presidential building in Belgrade, Vučić said his administration had preserved peace and stability during his time in office. He had announced his intention to resign in June and is now standing as his party's candidate for prime minister in the upcoming parliamentary elections. Under Serbia's constitution, he cannot run for a third presidential term.

The protests were first galvanised by the collapse of the roof of the Novi Sad railway station in 2024, which killed 16 people. Demonstrators, including students, teachers, workers and farmers, said the disaster reflected more than a decade of governing by Vučić's Progressive Party and believed the station's renovation, which the president had closely associated himself with, symbolised corner-cutting in major projects.

A series of resignations by officials linked to the government failed to placate the protesters, who continued to demonstrate through the summer and turned to unrest following accusations of police brutality. Vučić's presidency had been due to expire next year, but under Serbia's constitution a presidential election must now be held no more than three months after his resignation.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • Vučić has dominated Serbian politics for nearly a decade, and resigning the presidency does not end his political career, since he plans to stand for prime minister.
  • The protests forced his hand and brought together students, teachers, workers and farmers, making them one of the broadest civic movements in recent Serbian history.
  • The transition will test whether sustained street protest can produce institutional change, and how Serbia's pro-Russian leadership adjusts to his departure from the presidency.

Background

Vučić's Progressive Party has governed Serbia for more than a decade, and he has served as president for nine years. The immediate trigger for the crisis was the collapse of the Novi Sad railway station roof in 2024, which killed 16 people. What began as grief and anger over the disaster widened into a broader movement against corruption and what protesters described as years of corner-cutting. Government efforts to defuse the situation through resignations did not end the demonstrations, which continued through the summer and escalated after accusations of police brutality.

The station had been presented as a symbol of Serbia's progress, and Vučić closely associated himself with its renovation. For many demonstrators, the tragedy came to represent the failings of an administration they accuse of mismanagement and corruption.

Key Perspectives

Vučić and his supporters: The departing president cast his administration as a force for peace and stability, and he plans to remain at the centre of politics by running for prime minister in the parliamentary elections.

Protesters: Students, teachers, workers and farmers who have demonstrated for more than a year hold Vučić and his party responsible for the Novi Sad disaster and see his government as corrupt.

Critics and skeptics: A move from the presidency to the prime ministership may not satisfy those who want a genuine change of government, particularly if the Progressive Party retains control of parliament.

What to Watch

  • The parliamentary elections, and whether Vučić's party retains a governing majority or is voted out.
  • The presidential election that must follow within three months, and who the governing party fields as its candidate.
  • Whether the protest movement continues, given that demonstrators showed little sign of backing down even after a series of resignations.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.