Teen girl dies from strangulation during sex; authors call for regulation of porn and social media

David Corlett and Maree Crabbe argue that 'choking' has become normalized among youth, with tragic consequences

edit
By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time3 min
Sources3 outlets
A teenage girl has died from strangulation during a sexual encounter, prompting two Australian commentators to argue that pornography and social media are normalizing dangerous sexual practices like 'choking' among young people, and must be held accountable. Writing in major Australian newspapers, David Corlett and Maree Crabbe warned that such practices are now common but carry lethal risks, calling for urgent regulatory action.

The death of a teenage girl due to strangulation during sex has reignited debate over the influence of pornography and social media on young people's sexual behaviour. In an opinion piece published by the Sydney Morning Herald, Brisbane Times and The Age, authors David Corlett and Maree Crabbe assert that so-called 'choking' has become a normalised part of sex for a generation exposed to violent online content. They argue that platforms must be held responsible for the consequences.

While the specifics of the case have not been publicly detailed, the authors use it as a stark illustration of a broader trend. Research cited by public health experts indicates that strangulation during sex—often euphemistically called 'breath play'—is increasingly common among teenagers and young adults, driven in part by easy access to extreme pornography. A 2023 study by the Australian Institute of Family Studies found that 57% of young people aged 15 to 20 had seen pornography depicting choking or strangulation.

The 'rough sex' defence, where defendants claim the victim consented to such acts, has been used in several high-profile murder cases in Australia and abroad. In 2022, a man in Queensland was convicted after using that defence in a death, leading to calls for law reform. However, the issue is not solely legal—it touches on education, mental health, and platform governance.

Critics of the authors' position caution against sweeping regulation. Free speech advocates argue that blaming platforms for user-generated content risks censorship and ignores the role of parents and schools. The pornography industry notes that many sites already require age verification, though compliance is inconsistent. Sex educators emphasise the need for comprehensive, consent-focused programs that teach young people to recognise risky behaviour.

Legal experts point out that proving causation between online content and individual actions is difficult. While there is strong correlation, correlation does not equal causation. Still, the Australian eSafety Commissioner has previously taken action against platforms failing to remove harmful material, and a 2024 parliamentary inquiry recommended stricter age verification for adult content.

Corlett and Crabbe's piece closes with a call for community conversation and systemic change, arguing that another death will be inevitable without action. Whether that action will come—and what form it will take—remains an open question, with stakeholders divided on the best path forward.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The death highlights a real and preventable risk to teenagers; parents and educators need to be aware of the normalization of dangerous sexual practices.
  • Policy debates around online regulation intensify: should platforms be held liable for violent or coercive sexual content that influences real-world behaviour?
  • Broader implications for consent education and the 'rough sex' defence in criminal law are already under scrutiny in several Australian states.

Background

The normalization of choking during sex has been linked to the proliferation of free online pornography depicting aggressive acts. Surveys show a majority of young Australians have encountered such content before age 18. Landmark cases, such as the 2022 Queensland conviction, have exposed the legal grey area of consent to potential lethal acts. In response, the Australian government has introduced age assurance trials and expanded the eSafety Commissioner's powers, but enforcement remains patchy. The death now under discussion appears to be a fresh incident, reinforcing concerns that current measures are insufficient.

Key Perspectives

Authors (Corlett and Crabbe – health advocates): They argue pornography and social media companies must be held legally and socially accountable for normalising dangerous behaviour. They call for platform regulation and better education. Free speech advocates and platforms: They warn that over-regulation threatens freedom of expression and that the solution lies in parental controls and media literacy, not blame. They also point to existing safety tools. Sex educators and public health experts: They stress that comprehensive, age-appropriate sex education is the most effective prevention, alongside harm reduction strategies that address the realities of young people's online exposure.

What to Watch

  • Potential announcement of a coronial inquest into the death, which could influence policy.
  • Next steps from the Australian eSafety Commissioner or federal government on age verification for adult content.
  • Legislative debate in states such as Queensland and New South Wales regarding the 'rough sex' defence in murder trials.

Sources

newspaper

Zotpaper

Articles published under the Zotpaper byline are synthesized from multiple source publications by our AI editor and reviewed by our editorial process. Each story combines reporting from credible outlets to give readers a balanced, comprehensive view.