The United States finds itself in a protracted conflict in Iran that President Donald Trump does not know how to end, and the Iranian regime does not want to end, according to reporting by John Lyons for ABC News.
The Wall Street Journal reported this week that US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has been "quietly extending troop deployments" into 2027, a sign the war could continue well into next year. At the same time, the Journal reported that Trump has discussed with senior aides whether to officially declare the war over, with officials noting that the president "favours the idea".
The initial stated aim of the war—to ensure Iran could never possess nuclear weapons—has clearly not been achieved: Iran still has supplies of highly enriched uranium in a hidden location. A secondary aim of regime change, articulated after the conflict began, has also not occurred. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) remains in charge in Tehran, with a more hardline leader in Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei, who succeeded his father Ali Khamenei after he was killed early in the war.
A later goal, reopening the Strait of Hormuz, has likewise not been met. Before the war, the strait operated normally, moving about 20% of the world's crude oil and gas. Now only a trickle of tankers pass through, as insurance companies are reluctant to offer coverage.
The US has recently sought to widen the conflict, with new waves of strikes resuming last week and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announcing a plan for "economic asphyxiation" of the regime.
While both the US and Iran are feeling the pain of war, the political consequences differ. In Iran, the IRGC is not yielding to internal discontent over shortages of petrol and food. For Trump, though he cannot run for another term, his Republican Party faces two mounting pressure points: growing concern within the party and growing discontent from traditional Gulf state allies.