Friday 16 October 2026
Morning Edition
ZOTPAPER

News without the noise

ZOTPAPER
Australia

Two-thirds of Queenslanders doubt Brisbane 2032 Games will stay on budget, poll finds

Exclusive Resolve Political Monitor survey shows just 24% of voters are confident the $7.1 billion funding envelope will hold

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Sources3 outlets
Nearly two-thirds of Queensland voters doubt the 2032 Brisbane Olympic and Paralympic Games can be delivered within the agreed $7.1 billion budget, exclusive polling for Brisbane Times has found. The Resolve Political Monitor survey of 434 voters conducted between October 6 and 10 reveals just 24% are confident the Games will stay on budget, while 63% are not. Only 4% of respondents said they were 'very confident', while 36% were 'not at all confident'. The state LNP government under Premier David Crisafulli has long insisted its jointly funded delivery plan with the Commonwealth will stay within the funding envelope.

The poll results underscore a significant gap between government messaging and public sentiment on the cost of hosting the 2032 Games. The Crisafulli government has repeatedly stated that the $7.1 billion budget is sufficient and that the event will be delivered without cost overruns. However, the survey suggests those assurances have done little to reassure voters, with 13% of respondents unsure either way.

Among those with stronger views, the skepticism is even more pronounced. Only 4% of those polled said they were 'very confident' the Games will be delivered on budget, while more than a third (36%) said they were 'not at all confident'. The findings come as planning for venues and infrastructure continues, with major construction projects still years away from completion.

The Resolve Political Monitor is conducted for Brisbane Times, and the survey was taken ahead of any major recent cost announcements relating to the Games. The LNP government has not commented specifically on the poll results.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The poll reveals a major credibility challenge for the Crisafulli government on its signature infrastructure project, six years out from the Games.
  • If public confidence remains low, it could fuel political pressure to scale back plans or increase transparency on cost reporting.
  • Olympic budget blowouts have been a recurring theme globally; Queenslanders appear alert to that history.

Background

The 2032 Brisbane Olympics were awarded to Queensland by the International Olympic Committee with a promise of a 'new norm' focused on using existing and temporary venues to control costs. The current $7.1 billion funding envelope was agreed between the state and Commonwealth governments. However, major infrastructure projects, including a new Brisbane Arena and upgrades to the Gabba, have faced cost escalation concerns in previous years. The LNP, elected in 2024, made fiscal responsibility a central promise.

Key Perspectives

[Voters]: A clear majority are skeptical that the budget will hold, with only 24% expressing confidence. The polling suggests government messaging has not shifted public opinion. [Crisafulli Government]: The LNP maintains that the delivery plan is rigorous and that the $7.1 billion figure is a firm cap. They have not indicated any intention to revise the budget upward. [Critics/Skeptics]: Opposition parties and infrastructure analysts point to a pattern of cost overruns in major Games projects globally and argue that the $7.1 billion figure may not account for contingency or scope changes.

What to Watch

  • Any updated cost estimates or infrastructure reviews released by the Queensland Government in the lead-up to 2032.
  • Further Resolve Political Monitor polling to see if confidence shifts as construction milestones approach.
  • Public reaction to major venue contracts or any announcement of supplementary funding from the Commonwealth.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe