Tuesday 20 October 2026
Live
ZOTPAPER

News without the noise

ZOTPAPER
Business

Uber wins High Court dismissal of £340m black cab legal battle

Judge rules claims over alleged misleading of TfL brought too late

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Uber has successfully argued that a £340 million lawsuit brought by London black cab drivers and two private hire firms should be thrown out, after a High Court judge ruled the case had been filed too late. Mr Justice Birt dismissed the claims without examining whether the ride-hailing app had misled Transport for London, as the judge found the claimants could have discovered the alleged deception before 2018.

The legal action, begun in 2024, accused Uber of giving “ misleading and inaccurate information” to TfL in order to obtain a licence to operate in London in 2012. The case had been delayed by the Covid-19 pandemic.

Damages of nearly £200 million were sought on behalf of approximately 13,000 black cab drivers, while a separate claim from Kabbie and Iride – the latter of which no longer operates – sought around £140 million. Uber denied the allegations and argued that the lawsuits fell outside the six-year statutory limitation period.

RGL Management, which ran the case for the claimants, expressed disappointment at the ruling. “ We are obviously very disappointed and are considering all options available to the claimant cab drivers with the legal team,” it said in a statement.

An Uber spokesperson welcomed the decision. “ Uber is proud to work with thousands of private hire and black cab drivers to serve millions of passengers across London. We are pleased that the court has dismissed all of these claims entirely at the earliest opportunity and the ruling today has put these legacy matters firmly in the past.”

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The ruling closes a significant legal challenge to Uber’s London licence history, removing a potential compensation liability of £340 million.
  • Black cab drivers who alleged they lost business due to Uber’s market entry will not receive damages unless an appeal succeeds.
  • The case reinforces the importance of limitation periods in large-scale litigation against technology platforms.

Background

Uber has faced years of regulatory scrutiny from Transport for London, including licence revocations and court battles over safety and compliance. This lawsuit specifically alleged that Uber misled the regulator from the start of its London operations. The judge’s decision to dismiss on procedural grounds means the substantive allegations were never tested in court.

Key Perspectives

London black cab drivers and claimants: Alleged that Uber’s conduct caused them financial harm and that the company’s licence application was based on misleading information. They are now considering an appeal. Uber: Maintains it acted lawfully and argued the claims were stale. The company says the ruling confirms the complaints were without merit and allows it to move forward. Legal observers: The decision highlights the strict application of limitation rules, especially when potential claimants could have learned of alleged wrongdoing years earlier.

What to Watch

  • Whether the claimants file an appeal against the High Court’s ruling.
  • Any further regulatory developments between Uber and Transport for London.
  • Potential implications for other historical legal claims against ride-hailing companies.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by Harper Lane on the Business & markets desk. Read for legal risk by Marcus Hale, legal. Edited by Angus Burke, chief sub.

1 sourcefirst published 20 Oct, 4:46 am
Meet the newsroomHow we workSubscribe