WA three-way university merger faces upper house fight, minister says

Liberals and Greens oppose the proposal; students to rally against three-way merger

By LineZotpaper
Published
Updated
Read Time3 min
Sources3 outlets
Western Australia's proposed three-way university merger between UWA, Curtin and Murdoch has suffered a significant blow, with Higher Education Minister Tony Buti conceding the government has not articulated its benefits, as opposition parties in the upper house move to block the plan. The Liberals have formally declared they will not support the merger, joining the Greens in opposition, leaving Labor needing to secure votes from the Nationals, One Nation and Legalise Cannabis to pass enabling legislation.

The state government's proposal to merge the University of Western Australia, Curtin University and Murdoch University into a single mega-university has been met with mounting opposition since it was announced earlier this month. A steering committee is due to deliver a business case by mid-2027, but the plan has already been criticised over a flawed Deloitte cost-benefit analysis that contained citation errors attributed to AI use, prompting the government to demand repayment of the $160,000 fee.

Speaking ahead of a student and staff rally at Parliament on Wednesday, Buti said he understood concerns but blamed "misinformation" for opposition to the plan. He said he had not been able to articulate the government's position to students. Buti argued that the status quo in WA's university sector was unsustainable, pointing to senior executives earning more than $36 million a year in total. He said he wanted that money redirected to students and staff.

Buti rejected claims that the merger was a foregone conclusion, stating that if the steering committee's business case did not support a three-way merger, the government would not pursue it. "I know what I believe should happen, but that will not happen if the business case does not stack up," he said.

Opposition Leader Basil Zempilas called the proposal a "mega-merger nobody asked for" and questioned the government's ability to manage costs given its record of blowouts. "The government can't even get the facts right in its own cost-benefit analysis for a merger. How can West Australians trust it to get the merger itself right?" he said.

The vice-chancellors of Murdoch and Curtin have both voiced strong opposition to the merger, questioning its rationale. Labor does not hold a majority in the upper house and needs at least two crossbench votes to pass any bill. The Nationals, One Nation and Legalise Cannabis MP Brian Walker are yet to declare their positions.

Buti was invited to speak at the rally but declined due to parliamentary duties. The rally at Parliament's front steps is expected to draw hundreds of students and staff.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The merger would reshape higher education in Western Australia, affecting tens of thousands of students and staff.
  • Cost estimates exceed $1 billion, raising concerns about diverting public funds from other priorities.
  • The outcome could set a precedent for university consolidation in other Australian states.

Background

The proposed merger of UWA, Curtin and Murdoch was announced by Premier Roger Cook earlier this month. A Deloitte cost-benefit analysis from 2025 recommended the merger but was found to contain citation errors due to AI use, after which the government asked Deloitte to repay the $160,000 cost. A steering committee is developing a business case, due by mid-2027. Any merger requires an act of parliament, and Labor does not have an upper house majority.

Key Perspectives

Government (Tony Buti): Argues the sector needs major reform, that executive salaries are too high, and that the business case will determine whether a merger proceeds. Claims misinformation has fuelled opposition. Opposition (Basil Zempilas): Opposes the merger as unwanted and too costly, citing the flawed Deloitte report and the government's record of budget blowouts. Critics (vice-chancellors, students, Greens): Question the rationale and cost, doubt the government's ability to implement it successfully, and argue the process has been predetermined despite assurances.

What to Watch

  • Whether the Nationals, One Nation or Legalise Cannabis MP Brian Walker support or oppose the merger in the upper house.
  • The size and tone of Wednesday's student and staff rally.
  • The steering committee's findings and any independent cost projections when the business case is delivered in 2027.

Sources

Checked

12 claims in this story checked against 1 source: 8 supported.

Show each claim
  1. SupportedThe proposed three-way merger faces a hostile upper house that may stop it.WA Today - Latest News: “a hostile upper house look set to kill the proposal before it even gets off the ground”
  2. SupportedButi conceded the government had not articulated the merger’s benefits.WA Today - Latest News: “Higher Education Minister Tony Buti says his government hasn’t “articulated” the benefits of a university merger”
  3. SupportedThe Liberals oppose the merger, joining the Greens in opposition.WA Today - Latest News: “The Liberals officially stating they would nor support the merger. The Greens also do not support the merger”
  4. Partly supportedLabor needs at least two crossbench votes to pass the bill.WA Today - Latest News: “Labor needs two votes for any bill to pass.”
  5. Partly supportedThe government demanded Deloitte repay the $160,000 report fee after the analysis had citation errors attributed to AI use.WA Today - Latest News: “A 2025 Deloitte cost benefit analysis recommending the merger was riddled with citation errors because of AI use, which prompted Buti to request Deloitte pay back the $160,000 report cost.”
  6. SupportedThe steering committee is due to deliver its business case by mid-2027.WA Today - Latest News: “a steering committee would scrutinise the idea in a business case set to be delivered to government mid-2027.”
  7. SupportedButi said, “I know what I believe should happen, but that will not happen if the business case does not stack up.”WA Today - Latest News: ““I know what I believe should happen, but that will not happen if the business case does not stack up,” he said.”
  8. SupportedButi said the merger would not proceed if the business case did not support it.WA Today - Latest News: “Buti rejected those criticisms and said if the steering committee’s business case did not advocate for a three-way merger, it would not pursue it.”
  9. SupportedZempilas called the proposal a “mega-merger nobody asked for.”WA Today - Latest News: ““This is a mega-merger nobody asked for, and the more everyone learns about it, the less anyone wants it,” Opposition Leader Basil Zempilas said.”
  10. SupportedZempilas said, “The government can’t even get the facts right in its own cost-benefit analysis for a merger. How can West Australians trust it to get the merger itself right?”WA Today - Latest News: ““The government can’t even get the facts right in its own cost-benefit analysis for a merger. How can West Australians trust it to get the merger itself right?”
  11. Partly supportedButi said senior executives at WA universities earn more than $36 million a year in total, and he wanted that money redirected to students and staff.WA Today - Latest News: ““It is not right that we have senior executives in Western Australian universities who, as a totality, are earning over $36 million dollars a year,” he said. “I want a lot of that money redirected to help students and to help staff.””
  12. Partly supportedButi blamed “misinformation” for opposition to the merger.WA Today - Latest News: “Buti said he understood student concern about the merger, blaming “misinformation” and that he hadn’t been able to “articulate our position to them.””

Correction

An earlier version of this story presented a paraphrase of Tony Buti's remarks about explaining the government's position to students as a direct quotation. The source quoted only the words “articulate our position to them”.

Zotpaper

Written by Rex Doyle on the Australia & local desk. Claims checked by Ines Fairley, verification. Edited by Angus Burke, chief sub.

1 source8 of 12 claims matched to a sourcefirst published updated twice
Meet the newsroomHow we workSubscribe