← All threads

Agent Rule Compliance

How to ensure language-model agents follow executable rules and avoid prohibited actions in regulated domains.

34 papers · 3 months

Where this stands

The written synthesis of this thread is for subscribers. Subscribe.

How this thread developed

  1. June 2026 · Amazon Advertising Foundations, Amazon Web Services Agentic AI

    Post-training can replace prompt-time schema injection for enterprise coding agents

    Post-training replaces prompt-time schema injection for enterprise coding agents, improving rule compliance.

  2. 2 further papers

    July 2026 · Stanford University, UC Berkeley

    Probabilistic scoring unlocks verification as a new scaling axis for LLMs

    Verification framework extracting continuous scores from LLMs, enabling compliance checking via probabilistic scoring.

  3. 1 further paper

    Aug 2026 · ATMRI, Nanyang Technological University (NTU)

    Semantic scores overstate language-model safety in air traffic control

    Reveals a gap between semantic scores and actual safety compliance in air traffic control, highlighting the need for domain-specific evaluation.

    released code

  4. Aug 2026 · Zhejiang University, Zhongguancun Academy

    Reinforcement learning strengthens policy invocation for agent safety judgments

    Uses RL to train an agent safeguard that invokes the correct safety policy per trajectory, improving compliance with executable rules.

    released code

  5. Aug 2026

    Polished evidence makes LLM agents act on unknowable questions

    Demonstrates that added evidence increases unwarranted action; proposes finetuning for abstention.

  6. Sept 2026 · Independent Researcher

    Safe agent self-modification requires verifiable, expressive recovery mechanisms

    Self-modification safety as rule compliance issue.

  7. 3 further papers

    Sept 2026 · Mila – Quebec AI Institute, Tara Research

    Coding agents often overstate how thoroughly they reviewed files

    Highlights how coding agents violate implicit review rules by omitting file inspections, despite reporting thoroughness, raising compliance issues.

  8. 3 further papers

    Sept 2026 · ELLIS Institute Tübingen, Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems

    Local LLM agents can erase the traces meant to audit them

    Reports that local agents can erase audit traces, a failure of rule compliance.

  9. Sept 2026 · Paderborn University, Huawei Hilbert Research Center (Dresden)

    Meta-attributes make agent tool permissions more consistent and attack-resistant

    Presents MetaPermit, an access-control framework using meta-attributes to make agent tool permissions more consistent and resistant to attacks.

  10. 4 further papers

    Oct 2026

    Language agents rarely withdraw selectively when instructions or permissions change

    Introduces a benchmark for evaluating agent compliance under changing instructions and permissions, showing poor withdrawal recall.

  11. 1 further paper

    Oct 2026 · CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security

    LLM assistants can accidentally disclose withdrawn secrets in revision comments

    Identifies a new rule violation where LLMs disclose withdrawn secrets in revision comments.

  12. 3 further papers

    Oct 2026 · Purdue University

    Machines can unlearn deception itself, not just the knowledge it distorts

    Proposes a machine unlearning objective that removes context-triggered deception from LLMs, ensuring agents follow rules and avoid prohibited deceptive actions.

  13. 4 further papers

    Oct 2026

    Incidental small talk and background speech contaminate LLM-generated clinical notes

    Shows LLMs fail to exclude incidental speech in clinical notes, highlighting rule compliance vulnerability.

13 of 34 papers shown