← All threads

Reward Collapse in Reasoning RL

Investigating how reinforcement learning signals for reasoning tasks degrade with long traces, and methods to maintain reward discriminability.

10 papers

Where this stands

The written synthesis of this thread is for subscribers. Subscribe.

How this thread developed

  1. Oct 2026

    Random rewards reveal three stages of LLM capability development

    explains spurious-reward paradox via reachability and three stages of LLM capability development.

  2. 2 further papers

    Oct 2026 · Amazon AGI, Virginia Tech

    Token-level rewards make critic-free reasoning training faster and more accurate

    Introduces token-level process rewards in GRPO to improve training accuracy and speed, directly addressing reward discriminability.

  3. 1 further paper

    Oct 2026 · Harbin Engineering University, Tencent

    Residual advantage uses teacher-student disagreement as bounded step reward

    Proposes Residual Advantage using teacher-student disagreement as a bounded step reward to maintain discriminability.

  4. Oct 2026 · Virginia Tech, Cisco

    Co-evolving visual tasks keeps model training near its learning frontier

    VICO co-evolves visual tasks to keep model training near its learning frontier, preventing reward collapse.

  5. 1 further paper

    Oct 2026 · Institute for AI Industry Research (AIR), Tsinghua University, SIA-Lab of Tsinghua AIR and ByteDance Seed

    Divergence geometry and estimation jointly improve language-model policy optimization

    Proposes a generalized trust-region formulation with matched gradient estimators to mitigate reward degradation in long-trace LLM RL.

  6. Oct 2026 · King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University

    RL gains in no-think mode stem from reactivating existing reasoning

    Analyzes the mechanism behind RL gains in no-think mode, showing reactivation of existing reasoning patterns.

6 of 10 papers shown