← All concepts

co-evolving feedback

Imagine two AI systems that take turns improving each other. One acts, the other critiques or guides; then the actor uses that feedback to get better, and the critic is updated to give feedback that matches the actor's new behavior. The feedback itself evolves as the partnership progresses.

The papers here show this pattern across many settings: a specialist and a language agent, a planner and a coder, a search agent and a critic, a policy and a judge, a tool creator and a tool user, or a written guide and its rubric. In each case, updating only one side stalls, while alternating updates lets both keep improving and produces better performance than static or one-way feedback.

Papers
42
Released code
1
First seen
June 2026
Latest
Nov 2026

35 papers in the last two months, against 6 in the two before.

Start here

Three papers to read first, in the order they came out
  1. 1Multi-agent AI systems improve by learning from execution traces

    MAS-Loop closes the feedback loop in multi-agent systems by using execution trajectories to refine and improve systems across training iterations.

    Oct 2026
  2. 2Feedback criteria that track a model's growing ability halve its training steps

    Co-evolving a reward rubric alongside a policy by tracking its capability frontier improves and accelerates open-ended LLM training.

    Oct 2026
  3. 3AI agents can perform better while keeping fewer memories

    Memory curation by replaying source decisions before retention improves LLM agent success rates and reduces token use.

    Nov 2026

Who is working on it

Meta AI 3The University of Hong Kong 2Hong Kong University of Science and Technology 2Ant Group 2University of Science and Technology of China 2Alibaba Group 2

The papers

Most central to this idea first, not most recent.

Concepts are extracted from each paper and reused across the corpus, so this page grows on its own as the desk reads.