The Australian Federal Police asked Turkish officials to consider removing Masood Zakaria, who faces murder charges, from Turkey despite government lawyers warning that any involvement in a foreign deportation decision could jeopardise future criminal prosecutions, the NSW Supreme Court has heard.
The NSW Supreme Court heard Detective Sergeant Scott Murphy, a senior officer in the AFP's Ankara post, made the request in September 2022, asking Turkish National Police to weigh up options including removing Zakaria from Turkey. At the time, federal government lawyers had warned the AFP that involvement in another country's decision to deport an individual to face criminal charges in Australia could constitute an abuse of process. The warnings concerned the removal of another high-profile law enforcement target, who cannot be legally identified, in similar circumstances.
Zakaria faces charges over the murders of father and son Toufik Hamze, 64, and Salim Hamze, 18, and a conspiracy to murder Ibrahem Hamze in 2021. He was arrested in Bodrum, on Turkey's south-west coast. He was deported from Turkey in December 2023 and brought back to Australia on a chartered Airbus A319.
Zakaria's barrister, Murugan Thangaraj, SC, told the court: "By October 2022, you had decided you would be willing to act unlawfully if it meant getting Zakaria back to NSW." Murphy denies any unlawful actions, and the AFP maintains its actions were lawful and denies any involvement in Zakaria's deportation. Zakaria's legal team is seeking a permanent stay of proceedings, alleging officers abused process by facilitating his illegal deportation in a recovery operation akin to a kidnapping.
Prosecutors last week conceded the deportation was not permitted under Turkish law because of Zakaria's pending appeal against the country's decision to deport him. His appeal was not dismissed until February 2024, two months after his deportation.
In late 2022, weeks before his arrest, Murphy told NSW Police counterparts of his intention to have Zakaria "blacklisted" and removed from Turkey. In an email read in court, Murphy earlier told NSW detectives the AFP could push Turkish authorities to detain Zakaria on immigration matters and remove or deport him on character grounds. NSW detectives raised concerns about providing Zakaria's passport, held at a Sydney police station, to AFP officers in Ankara who said they were seeking it to facilitate his eventual deportation.
Shortly after the arrest, Ankara-based officers told Superintendent Jared Taggart, then acting commander of the agency's transnational operations, that Turkish organised crime investigators had acted on intelligence provided at a meeting less than a fortnight earlier. At that meeting, Murphy and his superior, Detective Superintendent Marie Andersson, shared intelligence with investigators who later deemed Zakaria a high-priority target, according to documents tendered to court. "They determined that Zakaria needed to be targeted and removed from the country," Andersson wrote in an email read in court.
If Zakaria's application for a permanent stay succeeds, the charges against him will not be prosecuted. Trials for the offences were vacated last year after Zakaria's lawyers levelled the allegations at the AFP. His challenge has also cast doubt on the prosecutions of several other individuals returned to Australia in similar circumstances. The court has heard the AFP paid more than $1 million for Zakaria's return.
Murphy, Taggart, Andersson and other senior AFP officers, including Commissioner Krissy Barrett, have agreed to be cross-examined after being guaranteed immunity from any potential prosecution arising from their evidence. AFP lawyers unsuccessfully sought to have several senior officers, including Barrett, excused from giving evidence. Court orders prohibit sections of the officers' evidence from being published. The hearing before Justice Edward Muston continues.
Analysis
Why This Matters
- The permanent stay application, if successful, would end the murder prosecutions against Zakaria, including charges over the killings of Toufik and Salim Hamze.
- The case tests whether police can use another country's immigration powers to return an accused person to Australia without formal extradition, and whether doing so makes a prosecution an abuse of process.
- The challenge has already cast doubt on the prosecutions of other wanted individuals returned to Australia in similar circumstances.
Background
The case centres on the line between extradition and deportation. Extradition is a formal legal process between countries, while deportation is an immigration decision by the host country. If authorities in one country effectively engineer a fugitive's deportation to bypass extradition, courts can find the prosecution an abuse of process and permanently stop it. Zakaria's challenge is being fought in open court, with senior AFP officers giving evidence under immunity while the agency denies wrongdoing.
Key Perspectives
- Masood Zakaria's legal team: alleges AFP officers abused process by facilitating his illegal deportation in a recovery operation akin to a kidnapping, and is seeking a permanent stay of proceedings.
- AFP and Detective Sergeant Scott Murphy: deny any unlawful actions and any involvement in the deportation, maintaining their actions were lawful.
- Prosecutors: conceded the deportation was not permitted under Turkish law because of Zakaria's pending appeal against it.
What to Watch
- Justice Edward Muston's ruling on the permanent stay application, which will decide whether the murder charges proceed.
- Evidence from senior AFP officers, including Commissioner Krissy Barrett, who are due to be cross-examined.
- Whether the outcome affects other prosecutions of individuals returned to Australia in similar circumstances.
Checked
12 claims in this story checked against 1 source: 10 supported.
Show each claim
- SupportedThe AFP asked Turkish officials to consider removing Masood Zakaria from Turkey despite legal warnings.Sydney Morning Herald - Latest News: “The Australian Federal Police asked Turkish officials to consider removing wanted underworld figure Masood Zakaria from Turkey despite warnings that any involvement in a foreign country’s deportation decision could jeopardise future criminal prosecutions.”
- SupportedZakaria’s lawyers are seeking a permanent stay of the murder charges, alleging officers facilitated his removal from Turkey.Sydney Morning Herald - Latest News: “Zakaria’s legal team is seeking a permanent stay of proceedings against him after alleging AFP officers abused process by facilitating his illegal deportation from Turkey in a recovery operation akin to a kidnapping.”
- SupportedDetective Sergeant Scott Murphy asked Turkish National Police in September 2022 to weigh up options including removing Zakaria from Turkey.Sydney Morning Herald - Latest News: “in September 2022 requested Turkish National Police weigh up options including removing the accused killer from Turkey”
- SupportedGovernment lawyers had warned that involvement in a foreign country’s deportation decision could jeopardise prosecutions or constitute an abuse of process.Sydney Morning Herald - Latest News: “the AFP had been warned by federal government lawyers that involvement in a foreign country’s decision to deport an individual to face criminal charges in Australia could constitute an abuse of process.”
- SupportedThe warnings concerned the removal of another high-profile law enforcement target from Turkey in similar circumstances.Sydney Morning Herald - Latest News: “The warnings related to the removal of another high-profile law enforcement target, who cannot be legally identified, from Turkey in similar circumstances to Zakaria.”
- SupportedThangaraj told the court, “By October 2022, you had decided you would be willing to act unlawfully if it meant getting Zakaria back to NSW.”Sydney Morning Herald - Latest News: ““By October 2022, you had decided you would be willing to act unlawfully if it meant getting Zakaria back to NSW,” Zakaria’s barrister, Murugan Thangaraj, SC, said.”
- SupportedZakaria faces charges over the murders of Toufik Hamze, 64, and Salim Hamze, 18, and conspiracy to murder Ibrahem Hamze in 2021.Sydney Morning Herald - Latest News: “the charges against him, including for the murders of father and son Toufik Hamze, 64, and Salim Hamze, 18, and a conspiracy to murder gangland rival Ibrahem Hamze at the height of an underworld feud in 2021”
- Reports differThe story’s sequence implies Zakaria was arrested in Bodrum before his December 2023 deportation.Sydney Morning Herald - Latest News: “Masood Zakaria was deported from Turkey in December 2023. ... was arrested four months later at a seaside villa in Bodrum”
- SupportedProsecutors conceded that the deportation was not permitted under Turkish law because Zakaria’s appeal was pending; the appeal was not dismissed until February 2024.Sydney Morning Herald - Latest News: “Prosecutors last week conceded that Zakaria’s deportation was not permitted under Turkish law because of his pending appeal against the country’s decision to deport him. Zakaria’s appeal was not dismissed until February 2024 – two months after his deportation.”
- Partly supportedThe story says Zakaria’s challenge has cast doubt on prosecutions of several other individuals returned to Australia in similar circumstances.Sydney Morning Herald - Latest News: “Zakaria’s unprecedented legal challenge has cast doubt on the prosecutions of several other individuals wanted by Australian authorities and returned to the country in similar circumstances.”
- SupportedThe court has heard that the AFP paid more than $1 million for Zakaria’s return.Sydney Morning Herald - Latest News: “The AFP paid more than $1 million for Zakaria’s return, the court has heard.”
- SupportedMurphy, Taggart, Andersson and other senior AFP officers, including Commissioner Krissy Barrett, agreed to be cross-examined after receiving immunity from potential prosecution arising from their evidence.Sydney Morning Herald - Latest News: “Murphy, Taggart, Andersson and several other senior AFP officers, including Commissioner Krissy Barrett, have agreed to be cross-examined by Zakaria’s lawyers after being guaranteed immunity from any potential prosecution arising from their evidence.”