Mark Irving KC, the former administrator of the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU), has told a parliamentary inquiry that the union was effectively forced to deal with firms linked to organised crime as part of its duty to protect workers.
Irving's evidence, delivered on Tuesday, provides a rare insider account of the union's conduct during the period before the federal government placed it into administration in August 2024. He said the union's engagement with such companies was not an endorsement of criminality but a pragmatic response to a workplace environment where organised crime had embedded itself in subcontracting networks.
"The union was protecting its members by engaging with these companies," Irving told the inquiry. "In the construction sector, you cannot simply walk away from a site because a contractor has questionable associations — workers still need representation."
Irving was appointed administrator after a series of media investigations exposed alleged links between CFMEU officials, bikie gangs and organised crime figures, particularly in Victoria and New South Wales. The revelations prompted the federal government to apply to the Federal Court for the union to be placed under administration, citing serious concerns about corruption and intimidation.
The inquiry is examining the effectiveness of the administration and the broader governance of the union. Irving's testimony is significant because it offers a defence of decisions that have been criticised by anti-corruption campaigners, who argue the union should have severed ties with criminal elements entirely.
A spokesperson for the CFMEU declined to comment on Irving's evidence, stating that the union remained focused on its ongoing reform process under the current administrator. The union has previously denied systemic corruption, characterising instances of misconduct as the actions of a small number of individuals.
Employment and Workplace Relations Minister Michael Lane said the government "welcomed" Irving's testimony but emphasised that no level of criminal association was acceptable. "The CFMEU was placed into administration for a reason," Lane said. "Any union that values its members must draw a hard line against organised crime, not accommodate it."
Legal experts noted that Irving's evidence could complicate the narrative that the union was a passive victim of criminal infiltration. Professor Samantha Delaney, an industrial relations scholar at the University of Sydney, said the testimony"shows the union made operational choices, and those choices will now be scrutinised."
The inquiry continues to sit this week, with further evidence expected from former union officials and regulatory bodies. A final report is due to be delivered by the end of the year.