Thursday 15 October 2026
Afternoon Edition
ZOTPAPER

News without the noise

ZOTPAPER
Geopolitics

Denmark pushes back after Trump claims oil and mineral exploration to begin in Greenland

Copenhagen says September pact does not grant US preferential access to natural resources

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Denmark has pushed back against President Donald Trump’s claims that oil, gas and mineral extraction will soon begin in Greenland, insisting that a recent agreement between the two countries and the island does not give US investors special rights over other NATO or EU nations.

The Danish Foreign Ministry reaffirmed on Wednesday that the pact signed at the United Nations General Assembly on September 22 does not alter the rules governing resource extraction. The agreement "does not grant investors from the US any preferential treatment" over investors from other NATO and EU countries when it comes to access to Greenland’s natural resources, the ministry said.

President Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform that "Massive Oil, Gas, and Mineral Exploration is getting ready to begin" in what he called "our new and beautiful Greenland," without providing details.

The 10-page accord, signed by Trump, Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen, and Greenland’s Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen, allows the US to "modernise and expand" its Pituffik Space Base in northwest Greenland and paves the way for two new military bases as well as Trump’s "Golden Dome" missile defence system. It reaffirms Danish sovereignty and Greenlanders’ right to self-determination. It did not allocate any mining or drilling rights.

Greenland banned uranium mining and all new oil exploration in 2021. Its government is reviewing whether a Texas firm, Greenland Energy, can use permits that predate the ban. The company said in August it planned to drill for oil in 2027 at an untested basin on Greenland’s east coast, although it lacks its own permit.

Danish security policy adviser Jacob Kaarsbo said Trump’s comments could signal his desire to control Greenland remains unchanged. "It is extremely dangerous to view this agreement between the Trump administration and Denmark as something that has altered Trump’s intentions," he said. Mikkel Olesen, a senior researcher at the Danish Institute for International Studies, told Al Jazeera that details regarding mining and exploration rights remained unclear and that information coming mostly from the US side should be taken "with a grain of salt."

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The dispute underscores ongoing tensions over Arctic sovereignty and resource rights, with the US seeking a strategic foothold and Denmark defending its territorial integrity.
  • Greenland’s resource wealth, including rare earth minerals, is of growing global interest, and any shift in access rules could affect NATO and EU allies.
  • The outcome will set a precedent for how the September pact is interpreted and whether US ambitions extend beyond military cooperation into economic control.

Background

Greenland, a semi-autonomous Danish territory, has been a focus of US strategic interest due to its Arctic location and mineral deposits. In August 2019, President Trump first floated the idea of buying Greenland, creating diplomatic friction. After months of tensions, the September 2026 pact ended immediate threats by allowing US military expansion while formally respecting Danish and Greenlandic sovereignty. However, Trump’s latest comments suggest he still views the island as a target for resource extraction, reviving questions about his ultimate intentions.

Key Perspectives

Denmark and Greenland: They maintain that the September agreement does not alter existing resource laws. Greenland’s 2021 ban on new oil exploration and uranium mining stands, while a pending review of pre-ban permits for Texas firm Greenland Energy is separate from the pact. US Administration: President Trump portrays the deal as a prelude to large-scale resource exploitation, framing Greenland as part of the US sphere of influence. His social media post lacks specifics but signals continued pressure. Security Experts and Analysts: Danish and international observers warn that Trump’s approach remains expansionist. They argue the pact may be a tactical step toward deeper US control, not a final settlement, and that ambiguity in the agreement leaves room for competing interpretations.

What to Watch

  • Greenland’s government decision on whether Texas firm Greenland Energy can proceed with oil drilling using pre-ban permits.
  • Any further US executive actions or Truth Social posts that escalate demands, such as proposals for resource-sharing agreements or revised treaty terms.
  • Reactions from NATO allies and the European Union, particularly regarding any attempts to bypass Greenland’s environmental and self-determination rules.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe