Newly released emails obtained by environmental justice groups show that officials in Hennepin County, Minnesota, monitored activists advocating for the closure of a waste incinerator, including by sending an employee to attend an open Zoom meeting and compiling a dossier that was sent to county superiors. Information gathered by county employees was also shared with industry and used to help defeat legislation, the groups allege. The county says the allegations mischaracterize its community engagement work and staff responsibilities, and that the actions were ordinary government functions.
The emails, obtained via a Freedom of Information Act request and with some published by the Zero Burn Coalition and the Minnesota Environmental Justice Table (MNEJT), lay out what the groups describe as a surveillance operation targeting activists pushing to shut down the Hennepin Energy Recovery Center (HERC), an incinerator that burns 365,000 tons of trash annually in north Minneapolis.
Much of the alleged monitoring ran through Joe Vital, an environmental engagement coordinator hired by the county in 2021 who was considered by many environmental justice leaders to be an ally and associate. In June 2023, Vital joined a Zoom meeting where advocates discussed next steps in their campaign, according to the emails. The meeting was open to the public, but organizers vet who is on the call to determine whether industry or political opponents are present. Vital developed a dossier on attendees and their planned activities, which he sent to his superiors, including department director Rosemary Lavin.
“Why are public resources and county staff time being directed toward monitoring community members who are simply organizing to shut down an aging, outdated trash burner that should have been closed nearly a decade ago?” Minneapolis organizer Audua Pugh asked county political leadership during a board meeting this week.
The emails also show that county employee Mallory Anderson got on advocates’ email list without their knowledge and forwarded messages to David McNary, a county official who sits on the board of the Minnesota Resource Recovery Association, an industry trade group. In March 2024, McNary wrote that he feared a proposed environmental justice bill “could impact [incinerator] facilities as well as every other production, processing and industrial facility in the state”. The next day, he sent advocates’ emails to an industry trade group attorney, the HERC operator’s president and other industry representatives. The efforts to help kill the bill were successful.
In another instance, Vital tried to confirm the identity of a whistleblower during a conversation with Khan, a recording shows. Khan said that when activists confronted Vital, he claimed he was actually working for them and that his activity was a ploy to gain intelligence on county officials. Vital did not respond to a request for comment. Khan said the activists do not believe Vital’s claim and that he had provided little information of value.
A spokesperson for Hennepin County said the allegations “mischaracterize the county’s community engagement work and staff responsibilities”. The county’s actions were “ordinary functions of government”, the spokesperson said, adding that officials “routinely attend public community meetings, stakeholder discussions and participate in social media to listen, learn, share information, and understand different perspectives on issues affecting the county and our residents”. “The county seeks to find alignment, when possible, but working together does not mean agreement on every issue,” the spokesperson said.
Similar battles to close polluting facilities are playing out in cities including Baltimore and Miami. Incinerators have drawn increased scrutiny in part because they are known to release high levels of PFAS “forever chemicals” and are also said to emit high levels of other pollutants.
Analysis
Why This Matters
- The allegations raise concerns about government surveillance of community activists, potentially chilling democratic participation and advocacy.
- The emails suggest close coordination between county officials and the waste industry, undermining trust in public institutions meant to represent residents.
- The case highlights broader struggles over environmental justice, where low-income communities and communities of colour bear disproportionate pollution burdens.
Background
Hennepin County operates the Hennepin Energy Recovery Center (HERC), a waste-to-energy incinerator in north Minneapolis that burns 365,000 tons of trash each year. Activists have long sought its closure, citing emissions of pollutants and PFAS “forever chemicals” that cannot be fully destroyed by incineration. Nearly 100 similar incinerators operate across the United States. The county has defended the facility as a source of energy and jobs, while environmental justice groups argue it harms surrounding low-income neighbourhoods.
Key Perspectives
Environmental justice groups: Alleged that county employees, including Joe Vital, infiltrated their meetings, compiled dossiers, and shared information with industry to defeat environmental legislation. Executive director Nazir Khan said advocates let down their defences because the county used people seen as part of the community to build relationships and gather intelligence.
Hennepin County: Denied the allegations, saying its actions were routine community engagement and ordinary government functions. A spokesperson said the county seeks to understand different perspectives and that working together does not mean agreement on every issue. The county did not directly address specific claims about the dossier or forwarding emails to industry.
Joe Vital (via activists’ account): Claimed he was actually working for the activists, gathering intelligence on county officials. Activists dispute this, saying he provided little of value and they do not believe his account.
What to Watch
- Whether further FOIA requests uncover additional emails or surveillance tactics.
- Potential legal action or public hearings as activists push for accountability from county leadership.
- The fate of the HERC incinerator and any renewed legislative efforts to phase out polluting facilities in Minnesota.
Checked
12 claims in this story checked against 1 source: 12 supported.
Show each claim
- SupportedThe headline says emails show Hennepin County officials tracked environmental justice activists, a claim attributed to groups.World news | The Guardian: “Newly released emails show local government officials in Minneapolis have quietly surveilled environmental justice activists who are working to close a controversial waste incinerator ... activist groups allege.”
- SupportedActivists say a county employee gathered intelligence at their meeting.World news | The Guardian: “County officials sent an employee who is also an environmental justice activist to collect intelligence, among other tactics, emails show.”
- SupportedInformation gathered by county employees was shared with industry and used to help defeat legislation.World news | The Guardian: “The information was then used to help successfully kill state-level environmental legislation opposed by the incinerator’s leadership”
- SupportedThe county said the allegations mischaracterized its work and described its actions as ordinary government functions.World news | The Guardian: “Hennepin county via a spokesperson told the Guardian in a statement that the allegations “mischaracterize the county’s community engagement work and staff responsibilities”.”
- SupportedThe Hennepin Energy Recovery Center in north Minneapolis burns 365,000 tons of trash annually.World news | The Guardian: “The north Minneapolis trash incinerator, called Hennepin Energy Recovery Center (HERC), incinerates 365,000 tons of trash annually.”
- SupportedVital attended a June 2023 Zoom meeting where advocates discussed their next steps.World news | The Guardian: “In June 2023, advocates held a Zoom meeting to discuss their next steps in their campaign to shut down the incinerator. Though the meetings are open to the public”
- SupportedVital compiled a dossier about meeting attendees and their planned activities and sent it to superiors, including Rosemary Lavin.World news | The Guardian: “The dossier included notes on who attended, including a sitting state representative and a former city council member, and each of the groups’ and individual’s planned activities. Among those who received Vital’s dossier was Hennepin county’s energy and environment department director, Rosemary Lavin.”
- SupportedAudua Pugh asked county political leadership why staff time and public resources were being directed toward monitoring activists, using the quoted wording in the story.World news | The Guardian: ““Why are public resources and county staff time being directed toward monitoring community members who are simply organizing to shut down an aging, outdated trash burner that should have been closed nearly a decade ago?” Minneapolis organizer Audua Pugh, who was among those surveilled, asked county political leadership during a board meeting this week.”
- SupportedMallory Anderson obtained advocates’ emails without their knowledge and sent them to David McNary.World news | The Guardian: “The emails were initially obtained by a county employee, Mallory Anderson, who had gotten on advocates’ email list without the advocates’ realization. On 12 March 2024, Anderson sent the emails to McNary.”
- SupportedIn March 2024, McNary wrote that he feared the bill could affect incinerators and other facilities in the state.World news | The Guardian: “McNary wrote that he feared the bill “could impact [incinerator] facilities as well as every other production, processing and industrial facility in the state”.”
- SupportedThe effort to help defeat the bill succeeded.World news | The Guardian: “Their efforts to help kill the bill were successful.”
- SupportedVital tried to confirm a whistleblower’s identity, and Khan said Vital claimed he was working for activists as a ploy to gain intelligence on county officials.World news | The Guardian: “The emails revealed other similar instances of Vital developing reports about advocates’ activities and sending them to supervisors, and Vital during a conversation with Khan also tried to confirm the identity of a whistleblower, a recording shows.”