Israel Expands Campaign Against UNRWA, Analysts Warn of West Bank Annexation Push

The raid, which targeted an UNRWA facility in the Sheikh Jarrah neighbourhood, marks the latest escalation in Israel's long-standing efforts to curtail the agency's operations. Established in 1949, UNRWA provides education, healthcare, and social services to some 5.9 million registered Palestinian refugees across the Middle East, including in the West Bank, Gaza Strip, Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria.

Al Jazeera reports that analysts view the raid as a deliberate step to undermine the agency's mandate, which is rooted in UN General Assembly Resolution 302. Critics of UNRWA, including the Israeli government, argue that the agency perpetuates the refugee crisis by defining refugee status in a way that includes descendants of those displaced in 1948. Israel has long accused UNRWA of fostering anti-Israeli sentiment and has called for its dissolution.

Proponents of UNRWA counter that the agency provides essential humanitarian services that no other organization can replace, and that its closure would destabilize the region. The raid, according to analysts cited by Al Jazeera, is part of a methodical campaign to erase the refugee issue from political discourse, thereby removing a key barrier to Israeli sovereignty over the West Bank.

Israel's government has not officially confirmed plans for West Bank annexation, but senior coalition members have openly advocated for it. The raid on the UNRWA centre comes amid a broader crackdown on Palestinian institutions in occupied East Jerusalem, including the closure of the Palestinian Affairs Ministry office in 2025.

Why This Matters

The raid on UNRWA could disrupt vital services for hundreds of thousands of Palestinian refugees in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, worsening humanitarian conditions.
If Israel successfully dismantles UNRWA, it would remove a key legal and political framework for Palestinian refugee rights, potentially paving the way for de facto or de jure annexation of the West Bank.
The move risks escalating tensions between Israel and the international community, as UNRWA is backed by a majority of UN member states and provides stability in a volatile region.

Background

For decades, Israel has maintained a policy of ambiguity regarding the West Bank, applying Israeli law to parts of the territory while not officially annexing it. The Oslo Accords (1993-1995) divided the West Bank into Areas A, B, and C, with varying degrees of Palestinian and Israeli control. UNRWA was established in 1949 after the Arab-Israeli war of 1948, which created the Palestinian refugee crisis. The agency has been a focal point of Israeli criticism, particularly in recent years, with some Israeli officials arguing that its dissolution is necessary for a peaceful resolution. The Trump administration's 2018 decision to cut US funding to UNRWA temporarily crippled the agency, though funding was partially restored under President Biden. More recently, Israel has escalated its campaign, including legislative efforts in the Knesset to ban UNRWA operations in East Jerusalem.

Key Perspectives

[Israeli Government]: The government maintains that UNRWA is a biased organization that prolongs the conflict by not resettling refugees. It argues that the agency's education materials incite hatred, and that its workers have been involved in attacks against Israel. The government believes that dismantling UNRWA is necessary for Israel's security and for any future peace agreement that does not include a 'right of return' for refugees. [Palestinian Authority (PA) and UNRWA]: The PA views the campaign as a direct assault on Palestinian national identity and rights. UNRWA states that it provides indispensable services to a vulnerable population, and that its closure would create a humanitarian catastrophe. The agency has called for international protection and for Israel to comply with UN resolutions. [Critics/Skeptics]: Some analysts question whether dismantling UNRWA would actually advance peace. They argue that the agency's closure could empower more radical groups, increase instability, and leave a vacuum that no other organization is prepared to fill. Others note that annexation would violate international law and could trigger international sanctions, potentially isolating Israel further.

What to Watch

The UN Security Council's response and any potential resolutions condemning the raid or calling for UNRWA's protection.
Whether Israel proceeds with formal annexation legislation in the Knesset, especially proposals to apply Israeli sovereignty to Area C of the West Bank.
The reaction of other UNRWA donor countries — if major funders like the US or EU threaten to cut aid to Israel in response, it could alter the trajectory.

ZOTPAPER