Perth voters oppose Woodside's Browse gas project and Kimberley fracking, survey finds

Greenpeace poll shows 71% of metropolitan voters back domestic gas enforcement over new drilling

edit
By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time3 min
Sources3 outlets
Nearly three-quarters of metropolitan Perth voters disapprove of Woodside's proposed Browse gas project and oppose fracking in the Kimberley, according to a survey commissioned by Greenpeace, which also found strong support for policies that prioritise domestic gas supply over new export-oriented drilling.

The polling, conducted by the environmental advocacy group, surveyed metropolitan voters in Perth and found that 71% expressed disapproval of both Woodside's offshore Browse development and the potential for hydraulic fracturing in the Kimberley region. The results suggest a clear preference among urban voters for enforcing domestic gas reservation policies rather than expanding gas extraction.

Woodside's Browse project, located in the Browse Basin off Western Australia's north coast, is a major liquefied natural gas (LNG) development that has been under consideration for years. The company has argued the project is essential for meeting global energy demand and providing economic benefits, including jobs and royalties. However, environmental groups and some local communities have raised concerns about greenhouse gas emissions, impacts on marine ecosystems, and the contribution to climate change.

The fracking debate in the Kimberley has been a contentious issue in Western Australia. The state government has maintained a moratorium on fracking in the region, but the possibility of lifting it has been a political flashpoint. Critics argue that fracking could harm water resources and culturally significant areas, while proponents say it could unlock significant gas reserves.

The survey also indicated that voters favour domestic gas enforcement — requiring that a portion of gas produced in the state be reserved for local use — over opening up new areas for drilling. Western Australia already has a domestic gas reservation policy that sets aside 15% of LNG output for the domestic market, but some advocates argue it should be strengthened.

Greenpeace said the results show a disconnect between government and industry enthusiasm for gas expansion and public sentiment. However, industry representatives have cautioned that polls commissioned by advocacy groups may reflect a sample bias and that the broader economic and energy security implications of restricting gas development must be considered.

The Australian Petroleum Production and Exploration Association (APPEA) has previously argued that projects like Browse are vital for Australia's energy security and for supporting the transition to renewables through gas as a backup fuel. The federal government has also expressed support for new gas developments as part of its 'gas-fired recovery' strategy.

With the Western Australian state election approaching, the issue of gas development — both offshore and onshore — is likely to remain a key battleground, pitting environmental concerns against economic arguments.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The survey reveals a significant gap between public opinion in Perth and the policy direction of both state and federal governments, which have consistently backed new gas projects.
  • Domestic gas enforcement policies directly affect household energy bills and industrial supply in Western Australia, where gas is a key source of power.
  • The outcome of the Browse project and the fracking debate could set precedents for how Australia balances climate commitments with resource extraction.

Background

Woodside's Browse project has been in planning since the 2000s, originally conceived as a floating LNG facility before being redesigned as a pipeline-to-shore development. The project has faced delays due to regulatory hurdles, cost concerns, and environmental opposition. The Kimberley fracking debate intensified after the Western Australian government lifted a moratorium on fracking in 2018 but imposed strict conditions, with the region's iconic landscape and Indigenous heritage at the centre of controversy. Domestic gas reservation policies have been a feature of WA's gas market since 2006, aimed at preventing shortages and price spikes. Calls to strengthen the policy have grown as LNG exports have surged.

Key Perspectives

Greenpeace and environmental groups: The survey is evidence that the public does not want new gas projects and prefers stronger domestic safeguards. They argue that gas expansion is incompatible with climate targets and that the state should focus on renewables. Woodside and the gas industry: The company maintains that Browse is a critical project that will deliver energy, jobs, and tax revenue. Industry bodies argue that restricting supply will hurt the economy and that the poll does not represent the views of regional communities who benefit from gas development. Critics/Skeptics: Some analysts note that surveys by advocacy groups can be influenced by how questions are framed. Moreover, while Perth voters may oppose new drilling, the state and national governments must balance energy security, export revenues, and the transition to net zero — a complex trade-off that simple polling questions may not capture.

What to Watch

  • The Western Australian state election (due in 2027) — the gas issue could become a major campaign point.
  • Federal government decisions on environmental approvals for the Browse project, expected within the next year.
  • Any changes to WA's domestic gas reservation policy, particularly if the upcoming state budget signals a shift.
  • Community consultations and legal challenges regarding fracking in the Kimberley, which could escalate if the government moves to lift the moratorium further.

Sources

newspaper

Zotpaper

Articles published under the Zotpaper byline are synthesized from multiple source publications by our AI editor and reviewed by our editorial process. Each story combines reporting from credible outlets to give readers a balanced, comprehensive view.