Why This Matters
- The hybrid war campaign directly threatens European security and could strain NATO's collective defense commitments.
- Cyberattacks and sabotage disrupt critical infrastructure, affecting everyday citizens through power outages, disinformation, and economic damage.
- Miscalculations could lead to an unintended conventional conflict, drawing in the entire alliance.
Background
Russia has long employed hybrid warfare—blending conventional military force, cyber operations, disinformation, and covert action—to achieve strategic objectives without open war. Since the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Moscow has increasingly targeted European countries with sabotage, assassination plots, and cyber intrusions to weaken support for Ukraine and test Western defenses. These tactics are designed to stay below the threshold of a NATO Article 5 response, making them a persistent challenge for alliance planning.
Key Perspectives
Western Allies: View the hybrid campaign as a direct threat to sovereignty and stability. They are under pressure to respond robustly while avoiding escalation, and are working to improve attribution, resilience, and intelligence-sharing.
Russia: Denies orchestrating these attacks, instead framing them as local incidents or false flags. Moscow portrays itself as a victim of Western aggression, using the hybrid war narrative to justify its own actions.
Critics/Skeptics: Some experts argue that the West's response has been too slow and fragmented, giving Russia room to operate. Others warn that overreaction could provoke a direct Russian military response, creating a dangerous spiral.
What to Watch
- Whether NATO invokes Article 5 for a hybrid attack, setting a precedent for collective defense.
- The European Union's progress on sanctions against those responsible for sabotage and cyberattacks.
- Any significant disruption to critical infrastructure (energy grids, undersea cables, transport networks) that could signal an escalation.