A 54-year-old stud farmer who, the Crown said, carried out veterinary procedures without qualifications and kept horses and dogs in conditions so poor that several had to be put down has been told he faces jail. Bernard Wentink pleaded guilty in September to seven breaches of the Animal Health and Welfare Act and one offence under the Veterinary Surgeons Act 1966, and appeared at Airdrie Sheriff Court on Tuesday for sentencing, which Sheriff Derek Livingston deferred until December 1.
The court heard that animals were kept at Wentink's home in Coalburn, Lanark, and in rented buildings in Lesmahagow and Cumbernauld. Scottish SPCA investigators searching the properties on October 31, 2023, found horses in stables in complete darkness and "standing in deep wet faeces", while others were in a muddy field with barely any food and no drinking water. The skeletal remains of a horse later traced to Wentink were also found in the field.
Scottish SPCA officers seized 13 dogs and numerous horses. Three Rottweiler dogs and a black mare were put down on welfare grounds despite receiving veterinary attention. Eight dogs were found in cages in Wentink's home, which investigators said left them suffering "unnecessary pain, discomfort and exposure to disease" because of the "unsanitary conditions", and four more were in an outdoor enclosure with large amounts of faeces and no access to food or water. Examinations found "widespread untreated disease and neglect", with some animals showing signs of "psychological distress".
Reading the Crown's narrative, fiscal depute Katie Allen said the poor condition of the animals would have been "obvious to any reasonable owner". She told the court: "Many of the dogs displayed fearful and stereotypical behaviours consistent with poor welfare and prolonged confinement." She said the combination of unsanitary accommodation, inadequate parasite control, lack of veterinary treatment, inadequate provision of food and water and failure to provide an environment suitable for the animals' behavioural and welfare needs resulted in unnecessary suffering and placed the dogs at a significant risk of injury, disease and ill health.
For the horses, she listed "welfare concerns" including overgrown hooves needing farrier attention, untreated dental disease, teeth with sharp enamel points and dental overgrowths, thrush, dermatitis, alopecia, faecal staining and swelling of the limbs. One heavily pregnant horse found in an old cattle shed with "wet deep faeces throughout" was suffering from malnutrition, painful untreated rain scald, an infected leg wound and a worm burden, she said. She added that Wentink had carried out veterinary procedures on horses as part of his stud business for more than 15 years without the qualifications to do so.
Sheriff Livingston told Wentink that imprisonment was at the forefront of his thinking but that he would examine alternatives, and would take into account that Wentink is a first-time offender. "Uppermost in my mind is imprisonment, but I will be looking at all other alternatives," he said. Leaving court, Wentink was asked by journalists whether he was sorry for what he had done and replied: "Yes."
Analysis
Why This Matters
- The case is a rare prosecution under both animal welfare and veterinary surgeons legislation, covering the treatment of horses and dogs across three sites.
- Sentencing on December 1 will indicate how courts weigh custodial sentences against alternatives for first-time offenders in serious animal neglect cases.
- Four animals were euthanised on welfare grounds, and the court heard of untreated disease and prolonged confinement affecting the surviving dogs and horses.
Background
Scotland's animal welfare law is enforced through reports to the procurator fiscal, with the Scottish SPCA carrying out investigations and seizing animals in distress. Courts can impose custody, fines, bans on keeping animals, or a combination. The Veterinary Surgeons Act 1966 restricts procedures that only registered veterinary surgeons may perform, and the case before Airdrie Sheriff Court concerns both that legislation and the Animal Health and Welfare Act.
Key Perspectives
- Sheriff Derek Livingston: told Wentink that imprisonment was uppermost in his mind but that he would look at all other alternatives, and said he would take into account that Wentink is a first-time offender.
- Fiscal depute Katie Allen, for the Crown: said the animals' poor condition would have been obvious to any reasonable owner, and that unsanitary accommodation, inadequate parasite control, lack of veterinary treatment and insufficient food and water caused unnecessary suffering and put the dogs at significant risk.
- Bernard Wentink: when asked by journalists outside court whether he was sorry for what he had done, replied: "Yes."
What to Watch
- The sentencing decision at Airdrie Sheriff Court on December 1, and whether the sheriff imposes custody or an alternative disposal.
- Whether a ban on keeping animals forms part of the sentence.
- How the sheriff balances the stated likelihood of imprisonment against Wentink's status as a first-time offender.
Checked
12 claims in this story checked against 1 source: 12 supported.
Show each claim
- SupportedThe stud farmer has been told he is likely to face jail.STV News: “He told Wentink he is likely to face jail.”
- SupportedThe animals were kept in “completely unacceptable” conditions.STV News: “Bernard Wentink, 54, kept animals in “completely unacceptable” conditions at his home in Coalburn, Lanark, and in rented buildings in Lesmahagow and Cumbernauld.”
- SupportedWentink pleaded guilty to seven animal welfare breaches and one offence under the Veterinary Surgeons Act 1966.STV News: “On September 15 this year, Wentink pleaded guilty to seven breaches of the Animal Health and Welfare Act and one of the Veterinary Surgeons Act 1966.”
- SupportedSentencing was deferred until December 1.STV News: “Sheriff Derek Livingston deferred this until December 1 to allow more time to prepare.”
- SupportedWentink was 54 and had posed as a vet.STV News: “A stud farmer who posed as a vet”
- SupportedThe Crown said Wentink had carried out veterinary procedures on horses for more than 15 years without the qualifications to do so.STV News: “She added that Wentink had carried out veterinary procedures on horses as part of his stud business for more than 15 years, despite not having the qualifications to do so.”
- SupportedSeveral animals had to be put down on welfare grounds despite receiving veterinary attention.STV News: “Despite receiving veterinary attention, three Rottweiler dogs and a black mare had to be put down on welfare grounds.”
- SupportedFiscal depute Katie Allen said the animals’ poor condition would have been “obvious to any reasonable owner”.STV News: “Reading out the Crown’s narrative in court, fiscal depute Katie Allen said the poor condition of the animals in Wentink’s care would have been “obvious to any reasonable owner”.”
- SupportedKatie Allen told the court: “Many of the dogs displayed fearful and stereotypical behaviours consistent with poor welfare and prolonged confinement.”STV News: ““Many of the dogs displayed fearful and stereotypical behaviours consistent with poor welfare and prolonged confinement,” she told the court.”
- SupportedInvestigators found eight dogs in cages, suffering “unnecessary pain, discomfort and exposure to disease” due to “unsanitary conditions”.STV News: “Investigators searching his home found eight dogs in cages, suffering from “unnecessary pain, discomfort and exposure to disease” due to the “unsanitary conditions”.”
- SupportedSheriff Livingston said: “Uppermost in my mind is imprisonment, but I will be looking at all other alternatives.”STV News: ““Uppermost in my mind is imprisonment, but I will be looking at all other alternatives,” he said.”
- SupportedWhen asked whether he was sorry, Wentink replied: “Yes.”STV News: “Leaving court after the hearing, Wentink was asked by journalists whether he was sorry for what he had done. “Yes,” he replied.”