Senior TasWater leaders privately blamed Tasmania's economic regulator for a "blatant mistake" that threatened to cost some customers tens of thousands of dollars in extra sewerage charges, documents released to the ABC under right to information laws show. The correspondence, including emails between chair Kevin Young and chief executive George Theo, was exchanged in September as the premier urged the utility to pause its new billing structure and customers reported bills rising many times over.
The pricing structure was approved by the Office of the Tasmanian Economic Regulator and applies from July 2026 to June 2030. It changed how some non-residential customers are billed for the fixed component of their sewerage charge, basing it on water connection size rather than their estimated demand on the sewerage network. One business owner told the ABC their bill rose from $630 a month to $3,800 a month, while a sporting association reported a $1,400 monthly increase.
Before the change took effect, TasWater had warned that some customers could be disadvantaged and proposed charging customers with larger pipes as though they had a smaller 20mm connection. The regulator rejected the remedy, saying it would create inconsistencies. In its April final report, the regulator said TasWater expected the proposal would mostly capture sports fields, sporting grounds and reserves, but that other customers needing large connections for pressure or operational reasons would not be caught.
On September 10, after concerns about the increases were reported in the media, Premier Jeremy Rockliff issued a statement urging TasWater to pause the billing structure and work with stakeholders. The release was forwarded to TasWater leadership. That day Theo wrote to Young that the premier's request was, in his view, a regulatory matter: "We should consider our response, what he is asking for is not for us in my opinion its a regulatory matter."
Young replied that it would be worthwhile for the premier or treasurer to write to the economic regulator asking what could be done to correct the error: "I think it is a blatant mistake and miscalculation that needs to be corrected."
The following day, Theo wrote that any review to address the mistake had to keep TasWater's total revenue unchanged, saying that if non-residential sewer access charges went down, something else would have to go up to maintain revenue neutrality. At a September 15 meeting, the regulator asked TasWater to investigate the issues with the new structure, and TasWater reiterated that any adjustments would need to be revenue neutral.
By September 30, TasWater believed 187 non-residential customers would see bills rise by at least $10,000 over the year, at least double the previous year, and estimated a cohort of 1,070 customers with connections greater than 50mm and no dedicated fire connection as potentially exposed. It estimated that relief for 91 customers whose bills rose by more than $500 and 50 per cent would reduce revenue by $1.25 million. A TasWater document said the increases may have affected 33 sporting fields and 62 mixed-use sporting facilities.
On October 2, TasWater said it would pause bills for some customers and investigate a new way forward.
A regulator spokesperson said the "prevalence and significance" of varied connection arrangements, including combined fire and water connections, were "not brought to its attention" during the price investigation, and that it began discussions with TasWater once this became apparent. The spokesperson said the regulator sets only the maximum TasWater may charge, and the utility is free to charge less.
TasWater general manager of customer and community Callan Paske said eligible customers who manage sports grounds were notified as of October 28 and their bills are being amended, while a solution is still being developed for other eligible customers. "Their bills remain paused while we work through this," he said. He said no additional costs would be passed onto customers, but the costs would need to be absorbed and could potentially require deferral of some infrastructure investment.
Analysis
Why This Matters
- The documents show the dispute over who is responsible for the bill increases, with TasWater's leadership pointing to the regulator while the regulator says it sets only maximum prices and that connection arrangements were not raised with it.
- Thousands of non-residential customers were identified as potentially exposed, including sporting clubs and mixed-use facilities, and TasWater has not yet said how it will resolve bills for those outside the sports ground group.
- TasWater says the cost of the remedy will be absorbed and could mean deferring some infrastructure investment, which may affect a capital program it has said is needed for ageing assets.
Background
TasWater is Tasmania's government-owned water and sewerage utility, supplying services across the state. Its prices are set through determinations by the Office of the Tasmanian Economic Regulator, which approves the maximum amounts the utility can charge over multi-year periods. The current determination covers July 2026 to June 2030 and introduced a new basis for the fixed component of non-residential sewerage charges. The utility has said it needs to raise prices to help fund urgent repairs to ageing infrastructure.
Key Perspectives
Kevin Young, TasWater chair: told the chief executive in a September 10 email that the premier or treasurer should write to the regulator asking what could be done to correct the error, saying it was "a blatant mistake and miscalculation that needs to be corrected".
George Theo, TasWater chief executive: said the premier's request was a regulatory matter and that any reduction in non-residential sewer access charges must be matched elsewhere to keep total revenue unchanged and the business financially sustainable.
Office of the Tasmanian Economic Regulator: says it sets only the maximum TasWater can charge, so the utility can charge less without approval, and that the prevalence and significance of varied connection arrangements were not brought to its attention during the price investigation.
Callan Paske, TasWater general manager of customer and community: says bills for eligible sports ground customers are being amended, others remain paused, no additional costs will be passed to customers, and the costs could require deferral of some infrastructure investment.
What to Watch
- TasWater's solution for eligible non-sports customers whose bills remain paused, and whether it is revenue neutral as the utility has argued it must be.
- Whether the utility confirms a figure for the cost of the remedy and names which infrastructure projects might be deferred.
- Whether the premier or treasurer formally writes to the economic regulator, as the TasWater chair suggested.
Checked
12 claims in this story checked against 1 source: 12 supported.
Show each claim
- SupportedKevin Young called the pricing error a “blatant mistake and miscalculation” in an email.Just In: ““I think it is a blatant mistake and miscalculation that needs to be corrected.””
- SupportedDocuments released to the ABC under right to information laws show TasWater leaders privately blamed the regulator for the pricing problem.Just In: “documents released to the ABC under right to information (RTI) laws show how TasWater's leadership internally reacted after the blowback, laying the blame on the regulator.”
- SupportedThe pricing problem threatened to cost some customers tens of thousands of dollars in extra charges.Just In: “Senior leaders at TasWater privately blamed the state's economic regulator for a "blatant mistake" that threatened to cost some Tasmanians tens of thousands of dollars in extra charges, documents show.”
- SupportedGeorge Theo wrote that the premier's request was, in his view, a regulatory matter.Just In: ““We should consider our response, what he is asking for is not for us in my opinion its a regulatory matter.””
- SupportedThe regulator-approved pricing structure applied from July 2026 to June 2030.Just In: “after the Office of the Tasmanian Economic Regulator approved a new pricing structure, valid from July 2026 to June 2030.”
- SupportedThe new structure based some non-residential customers’ fixed sewerage charges on water connection size rather than estimated sewerage-network demand.Just In: “It introduced a new way of billing some non-residential customers for the fixed component of their sewerage bill — basing it on water connection size, rather than on their estimated demand on the sewerage network.”
- SupportedOne business owner reported a monthly bill increase from $630 to $3,800.Just In: “One business owner said the change saw their bill rise from $630 a month to $3,800 a month”
- SupportedTasWater proposed charging some customers with larger pipes as if they had a 20mm connection, but the regulator rejected the remedy as inconsistent.Just In: “some customers with larger pipes would instead be charged as if they had a smaller 20mm connection. But the regulator knocked back the remedy, saying it would create inconsistencies.”
- SupportedOn September 10, Premier Jeremy Rockliff urged TasWater to pause the billing structure and work with stakeholders.Just In: “On September 10, after concerns about "unintended" sewerage price hikes were reported in the media, the premier issued a statement urging TasWater to pause and work with stakeholders.”
- SupportedTheo wrote the following day that any review should keep TasWater’s total revenue unchanged.Just In: ““As part of any review to address this 'mistake' it must be done on the basis that TWs [TasWater's] total revenue remains the same.””
- SupportedBy September 30, TasWater estimated 187 non-residential customers would face annual bill increases of at least $10,000 and at least double the previous year’s bills.Just In: “187 of its non-residential customers would see bills rise by at least $10,000 over the year, which represented at least a 100 per cent increase from the year before.”
- SupportedTasWater estimated that 1,070 customers with connections greater than 50mm and no dedicated fire connection were potentially exposed to the increases.Just In: “a cohort of 1,070 customers, who had a connection greater than 50mm with no dedicated fire connection, as potentially exposed to the increases.”