Safety & security

Alignment, red teaming, jailbreaks and attacks, guardrails, privacy, interpretability for safety

300 articles · page 7 of 7

Safety & security

Physiological grounding makes clinical language-model recommendations safer in controlled tests

Abdullah, Cambria and Živković coupled a clinical language model to a graph-based physiological world model that ranks candidate answers using homeostatic constraints, biomedical paths and drug-interaction penalties. On a 2,500-scenario safety benchmark, their training method raised the main safety score from 69.5% to 90.8% and reduced physician-evaluated harm from 14.1% to 5.1% on a blinded subset.

Safety & security

Masking untrusted web content to secure agents against prompt injection

The authors introduce Untrusted Content Masking (UCM), a defense that prevents prompt injection attacks on web agents by masking untrusted content in the Document Object Model (DOM) before the agent processes it. They show that the DOM structure alone can distinguish trusted from untrusted page regions without reading their content, enabling agents to observe and interact safely with web pages while remaining isolated from adversarial content.

Safety & security

Persistent-codebase AI agents vulnerable to distributed, gradual attacks

Hills et al. introduce Iterative VibeCoding, a benchmark for AI control in persistent codebases, and demonstrate that gradual attacks—distributing a covert side task across multiple pull requests—achieve high evasion (≥65%) across several attack models. They find that no single monitor is robust against both gradual and non-gradual attack strategies, but a stateful link-tracker monitor combined with trajectory monitors in a four-monitor ensemble reduces gradual-attack evasion from 93% under the weakest diff monitor to 47%.

Safety & security

Automated safety testing reveals 93.9% attack success rate across four agent frameworks

Feng et al. present Vera, an end-to-end automated safety testing framework for LLM agents that uses a three-stage pipeline to discover risks, compose executable safety cases, and execute them in sandboxed environments with evidence-grounded verification. Evaluating on four production agent frameworks (OpenClaw, Hermes, Codex, and Claude Code), they find average attack success rates of 93.9% under multi-channel attacks, and release Vera-Bench with 1600 safety cases spanning 124 risk categories.

Safety & security

First measurement study reveals widespread authentication flaws in remote MCP servers

Zhou et al. conducted the first systematic measurement of authentication security in real-world remote Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers, scanning over 7,900 live servers and performing in-depth analysis on 119 OAuth-enabled servers. They found that 40.55% of servers require no authentication, and among authenticated servers, every tested server had at least one authentication flaw, with 96.6% vulnerable to dynamic client registration attacks.