Safety & Evals

Guardrails, attacks, red teaming, benchmarks

44 articles

Safety & Evals

Security contracts preserve authorization across composable LLM agent systems

Zheng and Yang identify “security-context discontinuity”: failures caused when individually sound agent controls lose or reinterpret security information as actions move between components. They formalize an end-to-end contract system and report that its full configuration blocked harmful effects in 2,560 injected attack instances while completing 700 benign tasks and escalating 200 ambiguous cases.

8 Sept 2026
Safety & Evals

Causal framework distinguishes deceptive outputs from deceptive mechanisms in language models

The authors introduce a causal taxonomy to separate deceptive behavior from deceptive mechanisms in language models, testing distinctions across controlled guessing-game and stock-trading experiments. They find that deceptive outputs can arise without corresponding deceptive mechanisms, while also providing causal evidence that an agent's knowledge about a recipient's information state directly affects deceptive preference.

7 Sept 2026
Safety & Evals

LLM judges as measurement instruments fail reliability tests on shared endpoints

Haoyuan Zhu and Jie Zhang preregistered two evaluation campaigns that assumed LLM judges (used to score generations, filter training data, or rank leaderboards) would produce stable outputs for identical inputs on shared endpoints. They found that the instruments themselves failed validation: same-window repeat rankings reached only Spearman 0.400 against a 0.90 threshold, and byte-identical next-day replays reached 0.78 against 0.99. The authors document three mechanisms—a label-to-meaning mapping bias, candidate gaps below the noise floor, and input-identical ranking noise—and show that neither metric substitution nor sampling fixes the problem.

6 Sept 2026
Safety & Evals

Graph-based policy constrains LLM agents for topology-aware incident response

Vallabhaneni, Cagwin, and Wild built a security-operations architecture in which a graph encoder and reinforcement-learning policy analyze enterprise authentication activity instead of placing the full network state into an LLM’s context. On public cyber-security data and an Indiana University computing cluster, the system achieved 0.91 precision and 0.87 recall on labeled red-team events, with a median 6.3-second end-to-end response cycle.

6 Sept 2026
Safety & Evals

MLLMs fail to sustain goal-directed navigation in real-scale 3D city

The authors introduce UrbanGround, a sandbox built from 3D geospatial data of Hong Kong, to test whether multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can turn local visual perception into sustained navigation. They find that while agents show useful abilities in short-range spatial reasoning and scene recognition, they fail at orientation, pedestrian-aware movement, and correcting accumulated errors over extended exploration.

30 Aug 2026
Safety & Evals

Agent safety requires persistent state across autonomous loop iterations

Wu and colleagues analyze autonomous agents that repeatedly plan, use tools, verify results and retain operational state, even as their safety monitors reset. They establish a formal separation showing that persistent safety state can detect cross-iteration attacks invisible to any trajectory-scoped monitor, and propose LoopHarness to limit irreversible unauthorized actions independently of the loop horizon.

29 Aug 2026
Safety & Evals

Bayesian framework exposes hidden differences among seemingly similar RAG systems

The authors evaluate 27 retrieval-augmented generation configurations using a Bayesian model structured around how information and errors flow through a RAG pipeline. They show that systems with similar aggregate scores can behave differently after successful versus failed retrieval, and that labeling retrieval success is especially valuable for estimating whether generators follow the intended response policy.

27 Aug 2026
Safety & Evals

Physiological grounding makes clinical language-model recommendations safer in controlled tests

Abdullah, Cambria and Živković coupled a clinical language model to a graph-based physiological world model that ranks candidate answers using homeostatic constraints, biomedical paths and drug-interaction penalties. On a 2,500-scenario safety benchmark, their training method raised the main safety score from 69.5% to 90.8% and reduced physician-evaluated harm from 14.1% to 5.1% on a blinded subset.

27 Aug 2026
Safety & Evals

Financial agents can cite rules while still attempting prohibited trades

Luo and colleagues built a controlled financial-compliance environment and a monitoring benchmark to test whether language-model agents ground their actions in executable rules. Across experiments with DeepSeek V4 Pro and Gemini 3.5 Flash, displaying rules reduced but did not eliminate rejected orders, while independent monitors could be misled by trader rationales when enforcement evidence was withheld.

23 Aug 2026
Safety & Evals

Probabilistic scoring unlocks verification as a new scaling axis for LLMs

The authors introduce LLM-as-a-Verifier, a general-purpose verification framework that extracts continuous scores from LLMs by taking expectations over scoring token logits. This approach achieves state-of-the-art results on four benchmarks—Terminal-Bench V2 (86.5%), SWE-Bench Verified (78.2%), RoboRewardBench (87.4%), and MedAgentBench (73.3%)—and provides fine-grained feedback that can be used for reinforcement learning and progress monitoring.

7 July 2026
Safety & Evals

Masking untrusted web content to secure agents against prompt injection

The authors introduce Untrusted Content Masking (UCM), a defense that prevents prompt injection attacks on web agents by masking untrusted content in the Document Object Model (DOM) before the agent processes it. They show that the DOM structure alone can distinguish trusted from untrusted page regions without reading their content, enabling agents to observe and interact safely with web pages while remaining isolated from adversarial content.

7 July 2026
Safety & Evals

Persistent-codebase AI agents vulnerable to distributed, gradual attacks

Hills et al. introduce Iterative VibeCoding, a benchmark for AI control in persistent codebases, and demonstrate that gradual attacks—distributing a covert side task across multiple pull requests—achieve high evasion (≥65%) across several attack models. They find that no single monitor is robust against both gradual and non-gradual attack strategies, but a stateful link-tracker monitor combined with trajectory monitors in a four-monitor ensemble reduces gradual-attack evasion from 93% under the weakest diff monitor to 47%.

3 July 2026
Safety & Evals

Automated safety testing reveals 93.9% attack success rate across four agent frameworks

Feng et al. present Vera, an end-to-end automated safety testing framework for LLM agents that uses a three-stage pipeline to discover risks, compose executable safety cases, and execute them in sandboxed environments with evidence-grounded verification. Evaluating on four production agent frameworks (OpenClaw, Hermes, Codex, and Claude Code), they find average attack success rates of 93.9% under multi-channel attacks, and release Vera-Bench with 1600 safety cases spanning 124 risk categories.

2 July 2026
Safety & Evals

First measurement study reveals widespread authentication flaws in remote MCP servers

Zhou et al. conducted the first systematic measurement of authentication security in real-world remote Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers, scanning over 7,900 live servers and performing in-depth analysis on 119 OAuth-enabled servers. They found that 40.55% of servers require no authentication, and among authenticated servers, every tested server had at least one authentication flaw, with 96.6% vulnerable to dynamic client registration attacks.

21 May 2026