From the outside, the building at 2 America Square, half a mile from Tower Bridge, looks like any other commercial property. But much of the interior is occupied not by employees but by neat rows of nondescript black boxes, according to an exclusive report by The Guardian. The unoccupied office block is the subject of a court case that could end a widely used tax avoidance scheme estimated to be worth £1bn. Details of the scheme and the parties involved have not been disclosed in the report.
London office block stuffed with black boxes at centre of £1bn tax avoidance case
Exclusive: Court case over unoccupied building at 2 America Square could end widely used scheme
A seven-storey office block in London’s financial district that appears normal from the outside is filled with stacks of black boxes rather than workers, and is at the centre of a court case that could shut down a £1bn tax avoidance loophole, The Guardian reports.
The Daily Edition
The front page in your inbox each weekday morning: the lead, the picks, and why each one earned its place.
§
Analysis
Why This Matters
- The case challenges a tax avoidance arrangement that may have cost the UK Treasury significant revenue.
- If the court rules against the scheme, it could set a precedent affecting other similar property-based avoidance structures.
- The use of empty boxes to simulate occupancy highlights how far some entities go to claim tax relief on commercial property.
Background
Tax avoidance schemes that exploit rules around empty commercial property have been a focus for HM Revenue & Customs in recent years. Under certain conditions, landlords can claim relief on vacant buildings, but the rules require genuine attempts to let the space. Filling a building with inert objects to meet occupancy conditions is an established but contested tactic.
Key Perspectives
HMRC: Likely arguing that the boxes do not constitute genuine occupation and that the scheme is abusive. Property owners/lessees: Would defend the arrangement as compliant with the letter of the law, claiming the boxes serve a legitimate purpose. Tax avoidance critics: See the case as a necessary step to close loopholes that allow the wealthy to avoid billions in tax.
What to Watch
- The court’s ruling on whether boxes constitute “occupation” for tax purposes.
- Whether HMRC opens similar investigations into other buildings with unusual contents.
- Potential legislative changes if the court cannot resolve the loophole.
Sources
- The London office, the empty boxes and the £1bn tax loophole · The Guardian
- The London office, the empty boxes and the £1bn tax loophole · The Guardian