According to OECD data, the UK state pension is less generous than those in many other wealthy nations. For someone born in 2000 on average wages, the after-tax retirement benefits from the state pension and automatic occupational schemes are projected to replace 54.2% of UK average earnings. This is below the wealthy-country average of 63.2%. The gap narrows when other private pensions are included, but those relying solely on the state pension are significantly worse off than peers abroad.
The triple lock, which ties state pension increases to the highest of 2.5%, earnings growth, or inflation, has made the benefit more generous since its introduction in 2011. However, pensioner poverty has still risen slightly, largely due to housing costs. Despite this, pensioners are less likely to be in relative poverty than families or working-age adults.
Andy Burnham has announced plans to end the triple lock in 2030, instead linking increases to inflation or 2.5% without the automatic earnings link. This is expected to reduce the cost burden, but may lead to less generous increases over time.
The UK also faces a significant gender pension gap. The OECD notes that women in the UK receive about a third less than men in pension income, wider than the average gap of 22.8% in wealthy countries, largely due to lower lifetime earnings and career breaks.
While the UK spends less on public pensions relative to its economy than many peers, this reflects political choices such as investing in universal healthcare. The state pension is the single most expensive benefit, costing over £150bn a year, and with an ageing population, costs are expected to rise, though possibly less under the new system.
The article concludes that while the state pension has become more generous, individuals need to save more to enjoy a retirement comparable to other countries.